ONLINE configuration creation
Detecting/scanning of the EtherCAT device
The online device search can be used if the TwinCAT system is in CONFIG mode. This can be indicated by a symbol right below in the information bar:
.TwinCAT can be set into this mode:
The TwinCAT 2 icon (
) or TwinCAT 3 icon (
) within the Windows-Taskbar always shows the TwinCAT mode of the local IPC. Compared to that, the System Manager window of TwinCAT 2 or the user interface of TwinCAT 3 indicates the state of the target system.
Right-clicking on “I/O Devices” in the configuration tree opens the search dialog.
This scan mode attempts to find not only EtherCAT devices (or Ethernet ports that are usable as such), but also NOVRAM, fieldbus cards, SMB etc. However, not all devices can be found automatically.
Ethernet ports with installed TwinCAT real-time driver are shown as “RT Ethernet” devices. An EtherCAT frame is sent to these ports for testing purposes. If the scan agent detects from the response that an EtherCAT slave is connected, the port is immediately shown as an “EtherCAT Device” .
Via respective checkboxes devices can be selected (as illustrated in Fig. “Detected Ethernet devices” e.g. Device 3 and Device 4 were chosen). After confirmation with “OK” a device scan is suggested for all selected devices, see Fig.: “Scan query after automatic creation of an EtherCAT device”.
Detecting/Scanning the EtherCAT devices
Example:
Company A builds the prototype of a machine B, which is to be produced in series later on. To do this the prototype is built, a scan of the IO devices is performed in TwinCAT and the initial configuration ‘B.tsm’ is created. The EL2521-0025 EtherCAT terminal with the revision 1018 is located somewhere. It is thus built into the TwinCAT configuration in this way:
Likewise, during the prototype test phase, the functions and properties of this terminal are tested by the programmers/commissioning engineers and used if necessary, i.e. addressed from the PLC ‘B.pro’ or the NC. (the same applies correspondingly to the TwinCAT 3 solution files).
The prototype development is now completed and series production of machine B starts, for which Beckhoff continues to supply the EL2521-0025-0018. If the commissioning engineers of the series machine production department always carry out a scan, a B configuration with the identical contents results again for each machine. Likewise, A might create spare parts stores worldwide for the coming series-produced machines with EL2521-0025-1018 terminals.
After some time Beckhoff extends the EL2521-0025 by a new feature C. Therefore the FW is changed, outwardly recognizable by a higher FW version and a new revision -1019. Nevertheless the new device naturally supports functions and interfaces of the predecessor version(s); an adaptation of ‘B.tsm’ or even ‘B.pro’ is therefore unnecessary. The series-produced machines can continue to be built with ‘B.tsm’ and ‘B.pro’; it makes sense to perform a comparative scan against the initial configuration ‘B.tsm’ in order to check the built machine.
However, if the series machine production department now doesn’t use ‘B.tsm’, but instead carries out a scan to create the productive configuration, the revision -1019 is automatically detected and built into the configuration:
This is usually not noticed by the commissioning engineers. TwinCAT cannot signal anything either, since virtually a new configuration is created. According to the compatibility rule, however, this means that no EL2521-0025-1018 should be built into this machine as a spare part (even if this nevertheless works in the vast majority of cases).
In addition, it could be the case that, due to the development accompanying production in company A, the new feature C of the EL2521-0025-1019 (for example, an improved analog filter or an additional process data for the diagnosis) is discovered and used without in-house consultation. The previous stock of spare part devices are then no longer to be used for the new configuration ‘B2.tsm’ created in this way.Þ if series machine production is established, the scan should only be performed for informative purposes for comparison with a defined initial configuration. Changes are to be made with care!
If an EtherCAT device was created in the configuration (manually or through a scan), the I/O field can be scanned for devices/slaves.
In the System Manager (TwinCAT 2) or the User Interface (TwinCAT 3) the scan process can be monitored via the progress bar at the bottom in the status bar.
The configuration is established and can then be switched to online state (OPERATIONAL).
In Config/FreeRun mode the System Manager display alternates between blue and red, and the EtherCAT device continues to operate with the idling cycle time of 4 ms (default setting), even without active task (NC, PLC).
The EtherCAT system should then be in a functional cyclic state, as shown in Fig. “Online display example”.
Please note:
- ▪
- all slaves should be in OP state
- ▪
- the EtherCAT master should be in “Actual State” OP
- ▪
- “frames/sec” should match the cycle time taking into account the sent number of frames
- ▪
- no excessive “LostFrames” or CRC errors should occur
The configuration is now complete. It can be modified as described under manual procedure.
Troubleshooting
Various effects may occur during scanning.
- ▪
- An unknown device is detected, i.e. an EtherCAT slave for which no ESI XML description is available.
In this case the System Manager offers to read any ESI that may be stored in the device. This case is described in the chapter "Notes regarding ESI device description".
- ▪
- Device are not detected properly
Possible reasons include:
- faulty data links, resulting in data loss during the scan
- slave has invalid device description
The connections and devices should be checked in a targeted manner, e.g. via the emergency scan.
Then re-run the scan.
In the System Manager such devices may be set up as EK0000 or unknown devices. Operation is not possible or meaningful.
Scan over existing Configuration
If a scan is initiated for an existing configuration, the actual I/O environment may match the configuration exactly or it may differ. This enables the configuration to be compared.
If differences are detected, they are shown in the correction dialog, so that the user can modify the configuration as required.
It is advisable to tick the “Extended Information” check box to reveal differences in the revision.
Example:
If an EL2521-0025-1018 is specified in the configuration, an EL2521-0025-1018 or higher (-1019, -1020) can be used in practice.
If current ESI descriptions are available in the TwinCAT system, the last revision offered in the selection dialog matches the Beckhoff state of production. It is recommended to use the last device revision when creating a new configuration, if current Beckhoff devices are used in the real application. Older revisions should only be used if older devices from stock are to be used in the application.
In this case the process image of the device is shown in the configuration tree and can be parameterised as follows: linking with the task, CoE/DC settings, plug-in definition, startup settings, ...
Once all modifications have been saved or accepted, click “OK” to transfer them to the real *.tsm configuration.
Change to Compatible Type
TwinCAT offers a function “Change to Compatible Type…” for the exchange of a device whilst retaining the links in the task.
This function is preferably to be used on AX5000 devices.
Change to Alternative Type
The TwinCAT System Manager offers a function for the exchange of a device: Change to Alternative Type
If called, the System Manager searches in the procured device ESI (in this example: EL1202-0000) for details of compatible devices contained there. The configuration is changed and the ESI-EEPROM is overwritten at the same time – therefore this process is possible only in the online state (ConfigMode).